Friday, March 27, 2020

APPAM Virtual Happy Hour 4/3

Join Sherry Glied, Dean NYU/Wagner School and Kosali Simon, Associate Provost for Health Sciences at Indiana University/SPEA in this virtual happy hour. Policy talk, optional!


JPAM Featured Article: Scraping By: Income and Program Participation After the Loss of Extended Unemployment Benefits

August 17, 2017 03:17 PM

As part of our ongoing effort to promote JPAM authors to the APPAM membership and the public policy world at large, we are asking JPAM authors to answer a few questions to promote their research article on the APPAM website.

By: Jesse Rothstein, PhD, University of California, Berkeley; and Robert G. Valletta, PhD, Economic Research Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF)

What was the genesis of the idea for your research?
This paper grew out of our earlier work on the direct labor market impacts of the historically unprecedented extensions of U.S. unemployment insurance benefits implemented during the Great Recession. We found that these extensions did not meaningfully undermine job finding, so a natural question is what else people did after they exhausted their benefits. 
While collecting data and researching the topic, what were some issues you needed to consider beforehand?
We had to understand the complicated structure of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) data and its limitations for addressing our research question.  
You found that UI exhaustees are similar in observable characteristics to UI recipients who find employment before exhausting UI benefits, but also found statistically significant increases in public assistance programs among exhaustees.  Is this a result of longer unemployment durations or another factor?
We can’t make strong causal claims given the limitations of our data and research design, but our interpretation is that there is likely a causal effect of the disappearance of UI benefits on program participation. It does not seem to be a pure consequence of longer unemployment durations, as we would expect those to be gradual over time rather than sudden at the time of UI exhaustion.
Your data was obtained from the 2001 and 2008 panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP).  How large were your sample sizes?
We started with large samples of job separations, around 36,500 total, with most of them from the 2008 panel. By the time we zeroed in on our final sample of UI exhaustees, the samples were much smaller, around 1700, again with most from the 2008 panel. 
What are some of the more interesting or surprising findings/conclusions you found in the process of bringing this together?
We were surprised to see only limited increases in welfare program participation in the period immediately following UI exhaustion. We were also somewhat surprised at how much program participation rose during the period when people were receiving UI. Another surprising result was the sharp increase in self-reported disability immediately after UI exhaustion, which may signal later applications for disability insurance payments.
What is the main conclusion/takeaway that becomes evident from your research?
Our results imply that UI benefits, and in particular extended benefits during periods of economic distress, function as an important element of the social safety net in the United States that is not duplicative of other safety net programs.  
What are the policy implications of your findings?  What next steps would you like to see policymakers make? 
Our results imply that UI benefit extensions need to be evaluated on their own terms during times of economic distress, without an assumption that other programs will offset the income shortfalls created by the loss of UI benefits. 
Based on your research, what recommendations do to you have for policymakers in the event of another recession in terms of unemployment insurance (UI)? 
See our preceding two responses. While this goes beyond our direct findings, the broad body of evidence suggests that policymakers should consider further regularizing the process of benefit extensions during economic downturns, to make them more automatic and less subject to legislative uncertainties.
Authors' Bios
Jesse Rothstein is professor of public policy and economics at the University of California, Berkeley, with affiliations in the Department of Economics and the Goldman School of Public Policy. He is also the director of the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment (IRLE); the co-director of the California Policy Lab; and the co-director of the Opportunity Lab. He previously served as Chief Economist at the U.S. Department of Labor and as Senior Economist with the Council of Economic Advisers, Executive Office of the President, both in the Obama Administration. 
Rothstein's research focuses on education policy and on the labor market. His recent work includes studies of teacher quality, of school finance, of intergenerational economic mobility, and of the labor market during the Great Recession. His work has been published in leading journals in economics, public policy, education, and law. He testified as an expert witness regarding teacher evaluation in the Vergara v. California trial in 2014.
Rothstein received a Ph.D. in economics and a Masters in Public Policy, both from the University of California, Berkeley, and an A.B. from Harvard. He is a member of the editorial boards of the American Economic Review, Industrial Relations, and the National Education Policy Center. He was named the John T. Dunlop Outstanding Scholar by the Labor and Employment Relations Association in 2011. He is a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research and a fellow of the National Education Policy Center, the CESifo Research Network, the IZA, and the Learning Policy Institute.


Rob Valletta is Vice President for Research Communications and an economist in the Economic Research Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF). 
Valletta completed his Ph.D. in economics at Harvard University in 1987, after obtaining an undergraduate degree in economics from the University of California, Berkeley in 1982. He served eight years on the faculty at the University of California, Irvine, before joining FRBSF in 1995. He spent a year on leave during 2000-01, working at the OECD in Paris, France. 
Valletta’s research is primarily in the field of labor economics, focusing on topics such as long-term unemployment, part-time work, job security and job mobility, income inequality and poverty, labor unions, and the effects of public assistance programs and employer-provided health insurance on labor market outcomes. He has published widely in leading economics journals including American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Review of Economics and Statistics, Journal of Labor Economics, Journal of Human Resources, and Journal of Economic Perspectives. He serves on the editorial board of the journal Industrial Relations.
Valletta’s CV and research links are at:


Check out this and other Journal of Policy Analysis and Management articles online.


« Back

Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM)
NEW ADDRESS! 1100 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 650 Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202.496.0130 | Fax: 202.496.0134
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Subscribe to me on YouTube

Home|About APPAM|Membership|Public Policy News|Conference & Events|Publications| Awards|Careers & Education|Members Only

Web site design and web site development by

© 2020 Association for Public Policy Analysis & Management. All Rights Reserved.
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Events | Add Your Event